Sorry, sent this to the OP rather than the list by mistake. ---
Ed Seehouse said : > I think it would be a lot easier. If everyone learned with a strict > doctype we'd have faster development and lots of much better pages, I > think. Personally I don't think it makes a jot of difference. You can abuse a strict page just as easily as you can a transitional. The important thing is that you structure the page well and conform to the doctype you choose. (oh and I suppose the content is quite important too!) I can't move over to strict on many of my pages because I need some of those deprecated attributes. For example, the start attribute, has anyone come up with a semantically sound _portable_ way of implementing this? (CSS counters do not measure up - not when the majority of users in the world can't use them) Besides, I don't see why they chose to deprecate that attribute anyway - it's not always a presentational thing, often it's a content thing - why take that choice away from me? Sam ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
