> Eystein Alnaes wrote: >> I would like to ask the list of its view on which technique seems >> more appropriate (read: trouble-free) for a large 3-column site >> with mostly dynamic contents. >> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:22:03 +0200, Gunlaug Sørtun replied: > > [...] > I've personally found the percentage/em font-sizing to be most > cross-browser reliable. > [...] But I have discovered that, with Windows set to 120 PPI, the 100% dimensioned text is 'normally' 16 pixels in Gecko, but 20 pixels in IE and Opera. Mostly not a problem, but it *may* cause floats to drop if you use ems to dimension or pad blocks horizontally.
Cordially, David. -- www.hucklesby.com
______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
