Thanks again David, I guess I was right and it seems IE 5 - 6 has more padding or was that margin? I get to have a 4 day vacation from my marriage that I want a divorce from. My own biz! ;-\ The last real vacation was in 98' So I'm hoping this site's behind me after tomorrow.
1. Why the hell is IE 5.2 putting the graphic into the header twice (left and right)? 2. Safari with these screen shots unlike mine in OS10.4.7; the wider the browser the more the pict info. at the bottom disappears at 1280 x 800. 3. IE 5 and 5.5 windows 2000 are the same in pushing the middle column left even on 1280x800, and 6 windows 2000 looks like my percents are pushing the middle column (#main_content1) down at lower rez and the only one that's ok at 1280x800; IE6 XP similar and fine at 1280x800; IE 7 exhibits similar to NS7.1 and safari, yet clips the bottom of the picture and leaves a white gap even with my negative bottom margin of 29px. 4. FF looks fine @ 800x600, 1024x768, but picture is gone @ 1280 x 800. It looks like there is some hacks to be had, but my brain feels like mush! HELP! PLEASE! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Thanks David! I think it's a similar problem I believe with Opera, IE >> Mac, & IE6-7 >> which I think I've fixed to a resolution of 1024x768. Could you >> please check it now? >> The fix I just implemented for Opera and IEmac messes w/Safari and >> NS7.1 though, in that the picture bottom is cut-off. For Opera/IE Mac >> the bottom margin -29px works. For Saf/NS bottom margin -11px works >> leaving a white gap for the previously mentioned as well as IE6-7 I'm >> suspecting. >> >> I don't have any margins or padding on #faux-column, and the >> percent's of everything inside is under 100% [ #sidebar_left width is >> 18%, (#main_content1 is 46%), and #sidebar_rt is 30% width plus a >> total of 5% ??padding w/IE 6-7??] > > > > www.videointegrations.com/odyssey/ > > I have noticed that you have been working with Francey on the list. > You are in good hands! DEFINITELY! I owe him a bottle of wine or something? > > There are 33 captures here (I did not wait for them to load): > <http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=278985> > Regards, > ~dL > PS Personal Opinion: I think you are setting yourself, and your > client, up with those w3c and 'bobby' buttons. They detract from the > content of the site, and will only confuse the clients users. The plan is to remove them fairly soon;-) It's partially marketing;-\ Me that is! ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
