Bradley Wright wrote:
> While your solution is sound (and appropriate), I'm curious as to
> where you get the impression that browsers use "display: block;" for
> <img /> elements under any doctype--even when there isn't one. This
> has never been my experience, and I don't believe it's the case in
> the specifications, either.
Correct. I got the differences usually seen between "standard mode" and
"almost standard mode" in a number of browsers, mixed up with what
happened in this case - because the solution is, or can be, the same.
In the case 'display: block' fixed (one of) IE's whitespace bugs, and is
a sound, case-dependent, "fix".
In other cases 'display: block' will simply solve differences seen
between the different modes - the way browsers line up images.
I invite Philippe to forward his off-list description to the list (so I
don't have to), to eliminate any confusion I may have introduced on this
matter.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
