>>> It would be courteous to provide a note of some sort before linking to
>>> samples with explicit or pornographic content
>> Please accept my apologies. My only excuse is to point to cultural
>> differences,
>Nothing to apologize for, except that the only nudity was that of a guy.
>Americans aren't big on that.
Whether Americans are big on one kind of nudity or not (and what was described
above was not all I saw) some people access their CSS-D account from work.
Accessing pornography, as defined by any given "company policy" (depends on the
person's workplace, I mean) from company computers can be grounds for dismissal
from said job.
It would be truly tragic for someone to /lose their job/ because they were
trying to help you with a CSS problem, and accessed your uncensored website
from work.
Simply saying that the content may not be "work friendly" or indicating that it
may be more "adult" or "mature" than is acceptable for work would give those
who must be careful to abide by company policy an indication that they
shouldn't visit "your" website while using sensitive/monitored computers.
>In the future, I recommend a code word, like "Continenatal version" for
>pictures with nudity.
"Mature content" or "not work (or child!) friendly" would be easier to decipher
as to meaning than "Continenatal version" which seems rather obscure (assuming
"Continental was meant") as I'm sure almost all of us live on continents.
~holly
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
