Bruno Fassino wrote: > Steve Clason wrote: > >> Although IE7 does support the :hover pseudoclass on elements other than >> <a>, making Suckerfish-type navigation work without JavaScript, you >> have to be careful to trigger "hasLayout" in both the element and the >> element pseudoclass, and you have to use two different triggers, >> apparently. >> >> There's a test case at http://www.bch.org/ie7HoverTest.html. > > Thanks for sharing this, it's really weird. > Just a small comment: I wouldn't say that IE needs a further hasLayout > trigger, but rather that it needs at least one extra property (on the target > "li:hover ul"), choosen among a certain set. > To be more precise, I tried adding in your example either > "background-position: 0 0" or "border-width: 0" to "#nav3 li:hover ul" and > both of them solved the problem, like your "min-height: 1px". > This behaviour is somewhat similar (but even more confusing), to the well > known need for some extra property on any "a:hover", to have IE to pay > attention to "a:hover descendant".
Well, sure enough, look at that. I added a version with "border-width: 0" to the test case and (of course) it works just as you describe. Thank you Bruno--I hadn't heard of IE's need for that extra property--I guess I wasn't paying attention that day. I appreciate your comment immensely. -- Steve Clason Web Design & Development Boulder, Colorado, USA www.topdogstrategy.com (303)818-8590 ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
