Yes, but the problem still exists without the 'silly frame'
Matt Ryan schreef:
Maybe it does not have a doctype and is not valid html?
It looks like it's the silly frame around the template that is invalid.
The template itself ( at
http://www.openwebdesign.org/design/3487/corporatelike/ ) looks to be
ok:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openwebdesign.org%2Fdesign%2F3487%2Fcorporatelike%2F
Matt Ryan
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Thijs Hakkenberg,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voorzitter Stichting Ebriositas [kvk: 34210081]
www.ebriositas.nl <http://www.ebriositas.nl/>
Student Natuurkunde UvA
www.uva.nl <http://www.uva.nl/>
Systeembeheerder Stichting Varkens in Nood
www.varkensinnood.nl <http://www.varkensinnood.nl/>
Contact:
Tel: 06-48761131
www.hakkenberg.com <http://www.hakkenberg.com/>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
