At 10:17 PM +0000 1/23/07, Dave Goodchild wrote: >I don't think that many designers worry about web-safe colours these days - >and even back in the day according to some articles the REAL web-safe >pallette was much less than 216 colours. But these days I think it's pretty >much a redundant approach. Go for sRGB.
No offense to anyone. Actually, true web-safe colors were less than a dozen actual colors. The term "web-safe" was really a misnomer. Limiting colors these days is pointless. I would suggest that the Government of Canada spend it's time and resources on things that matter? After all, the Government of Canada did waste it's time enforcing "web-safe" colors which were anything but web-safe. Now, they want to enforce "web-smart"? Just one waste of time following another, IMO. However, they did see the light with css -- bravo Canada. But, you might had issued your second mandate sooner if you had not wasted time enforcing web-safe colors. Just food for thought. tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
