Zoe wrote: > Users are used to things moving when you scroll, so I've never needed to change that.
On 08/02/07, Barney Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To be honest, I do see fixed elements as a bit of a flashy luxury - and > something that is often used irresponsibly to create cumbersome designs. > More than a few times I've considered finally pushing the boat out on > this technique, only to realise a CSS2-only solution ended up more > elegant. This is true, I don't like it when things stray away from what I expect or jump at me. However, now that IE7 supports it, I believe more and more people will start to use it and so users will become more accustomed to it. Whether it annoys them or not is another matter. If used properly, I do think it has its benefits. This is the URL: http://127.0.0.1/G/melbourne/1/ Please look at it in either Firefox or Opera 9 - it's buggy in everything else since it's just an experiment for now, my CSS playpen so to speak. You should be able to see something saying "NEXT" vertically at the bottom right. There is also a 'PREV' one on the left if you set the number of thumbs to something smaller (hover over 'settings'). Anyway, this tab has position:fixed and is positioned relative to the bottom right. If the viewport is big enough (such as when the thumbs are all on one line), it appears below the cream-coloured area and into the grey bit, which is unsightly. Ideally, I would position it from either the bottom of the cream area or from the top of the thumbs' container (ul#thumbarray). And it stays there upon scrolling. Just like in PPK's site. I'm interested in your opinions. Cheers, Rafael ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
