Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
>> Gah, I missed one sentence there
>> <quote>
>> '[Border-width doesn't allow percentages in CSS2; should we allow
>> percentages (of the containing block's width) in CSS3?]'
>> </quote>
>> Written in red, guess that is why I couldn't see it. :p
>>
>
> Probably :-)
>
> So, it looks like Opera treats that percentage-width border in
> accordance with the not yet recommended CSS3.
> We at least can't call it an Opera bug then, but rather wait till other
> browsers either pick up on it or W3C change that part in CSS3.
>
> Georg
>
According to this, and for the time being, the css-validator with option
css3 is saying "yes" to the question:
'[... should we allow percentages (of the containing block's width)
in CSS3?]'
w3c css-3 validating of testpage
<http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fhome.tiscali.nl%2Fdeveloperscorner%2Fcss-discuss%2Ftest-operadots.html&warning=2&profile=css3&usermedium=all>
Molly the Cat will like it: Opera ahead for the future! ;-)
francky
btw: maybe next question for w3c:
[css2 doesn't say what is the definition of a 'dot' - should we allow
UA's to have their own definition like now (FF and Opera: a dot is a
square dot; IE: a dot is a round dot) ?] screenshot
<http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/images/just-a-dot.gif>
:-)
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
