francky wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: >> [...] >> As a strictly personal opinion, I think I'd do the rollovers with >> text, rather than images as he has in the example. >> As it stands now, you've got a tremendous amount of code and a bunch >> of images need to create a simple means of navigation. >> >> Best, >> ~dL >> >> PS Do you think the content text is maybe a little tiny for some folks? >> >> > Hi Kathi, > ... setting the font-size in relative units will help (IE visitors > can't change px fixed sizes). > ... and an alternative for the menu can be to use a list with a 1 > image css rollover (as well for the horizontal as for the vertical menu): > > example page > > <http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/test-jakob-nav.htm> > > Will save 26 small images > save 26 http-requests > save lots of > download time too [1] :-) > > Greetings, > francky > > [1] > As the page is now, it needs 40 sec. to display with a 56Kbps > telephone modem connection. >
I think I need some clarification. It is my understanding that a pixel is a relative unit of measure (relative to the viewing device) [1]. And IE users /can/ scale fonts set in pixels (granted it is a pain) by ignoring the authors specifications: internet options> accessibility> ignore font sizes specified on Web pages> view> text-size> and pick your poison> Some say thoughtful authors set fonts with percent or em to alleviate IE users from going through this drill. [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/syndata.html#length-units> Best, ~dL PS Nice menu, Francky :-) . -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
