Excellent, thanks. That was where I was going wrong. Regards,
Ian. On 8 Jun 2007, at 2:22 pm, ron zisman wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Ian Piper wrote: > >> <http://www.tellura.co.uk/fenditching/page4/case_studies.htm> >> > > Basically, the hovered (large) image is positioned relative to the > browser-window, while it should be positioned relative to the element > holding the link. It is essential, for the effect you're after, > that the > hovered (large) image is in the link-position, or else it'll lose > focus > when hovered. > > Add... > > .hoverpic_reed_fen_farm {position: relative;} > > ...to establish the relation. > > Correct position to something like... > > .hoverpic_reed_fen_farm a:hover img, .hoverpic_reed_fen_farm a:active > img, .hoverpic_reed_fen_farm a:focus img {left: -10px; top: -70px;} > > ...to keep it in correct place when hovered. > > regards > Georg > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
