On 30/07/07, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Lockerbie wrote:
> On 30/07/07, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> John Lockerbie wrote:
> 
> On 30/07/07, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> John Lockerbie wrote:
> 
> 
> I forgot to say, I've still got the problem with what I think is   > the IE 
> double margin problem which I can't seem to solve. It shows 
> itself in Win IE 5.1,5.5 and 6, but not 7. See Browsershots:
>  http://browsershots.org/website/http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html
> 
> Does anybody know what I've done wrong?
> 
> Regards
> JL
> 
> 
> 
> The address for the problem float drop which occurs on Win IE 5.1,5.5  and 6 
> but not 7, is: http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html with css file: 
> http://catnaps.org/latest/latest.css
> 
> With kind regards
> JL
> 
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> 
> If you can cope with not having cross-browser pixel perfection, 
> the correction on a local file (without hacking) is to change the 
> margin in #sidebar to read:
> margin: 10px 0 10px 5px;
> 
> Others on the list may offer a better alternative.
> 
> Best,
> 
> ~dL
> --
> http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
> 
> 
> David,
> 
> I'll have a look at that suggestion though I would prefer to get a
> more symmetrically arrangement if at all possible.
> 
> With kind regards
> JL
> 
>
>
>
> John,
>
> I experimented a little and have it closer in compliant browsers 
> as well as IE7 through IE5.01 (did not check mac/ie5.2). It may 
> not pass a micrometer test for cross browser pixel perfection but 
> it is far better than it was.
>
> Note that the file is now in quirks for IE6 and down, and that in 
> 5,5 and 5.01 the page is now centered. You'll want to validate. 
> And I don't remember all that I changed. You'll need compare my 
> styles with yours.
>
> The uri is:
> http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/arch.html>
>
> Best,
> ~dL
>
> --
> http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>

David,

Thank you very much for your time and effort. I'll take a close look
at what you've done and see if I can then amend my site to suit.
Incidentally, the site was always supposed to be centred.

I've been trying to re-rationalise what I'm doing and simplify it but seem to 
be getting lost with all the different methods I'm trying.
Isn't css fun...?

With kind regards 
JL
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
nach oben -  vorherige - nächste Nachricht

Hello Jim,

Isn't  this a fancy posting? The original message above had about 115 lines, 13 
of which were a message of significance for one subscriber.

The 13 were neither 'top-posted' nor 'bottom-posted', but sandwiched in between 
all the quoted "material" and the lines which the list software appends to all 
messages. 

----------

And now here is my posting of about 135 lines with 7 perhaps significant lines. 
But it is at least 'bottom-posted' as desired.

I apologize to all who scrolled all the way down here for nothing.

And I'll now revert to quiet mode and refrain from pursuing this 'stuff' any 
further.

Cheers,  Bruce


______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to