> Subject: [css-d] Are table-based layouts still needed > > > Or, do table-based layouts still have a place on the web? > > There will definitly be a lot of table-based layouts for many > times to come. > Not everyone has the knowledge nor is obligated to use CSS-based layouts. > > But from a web professional standpoint, do you think table-based layouts > still need to be used for some particular layouts? > > In other words, can pure CSS layouts do everything a table-based > layout can > do?
I reckon that if it is table based, you can build with a CSS layout. I have just rebuilt a table based design (neat but different on every page) and rebuilt using CSS. It wasn't easy and I reckon that if I did it again it would be even neater HTML wise. Lots of folks who use Dreamweaver rely on tables and there are lots of really excellent designers who don't have a clue about valid html far less CSS. I guess it was ever thus. Keep the faith Ian No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.13.2/983 - Release Date: 01/09/2007 16:20 ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
