[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The issue with this the solution is that when I increase the width > of' #section1 div div' (and #section2) then the rose image starts to > hide behind the widened <DIV>.
...because I declared a white background on that div. Won't hide anything when the relevant background is made transparent. Check this example again... <http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/try/test_07_0926.html> ...with changed 'width' and 'background'. > http://www.trystandsamthewedding.com/test/home4.htm > > It works ok in IE 7.0 so far, bit do I need to add additional > protection to it against IE 6.0 browsers? (isnt there box model > issues, or something?) Yes, as browsers that don't follow W3C recommendations do not add the padding to the width. That means all IE/win versions older than IE6 will use the old model and need corrections/hacks. For IE6 that's only a problem when the document triggers 'quirks mode' in that version - as your page does now. I'm used to "battle" the box model differences, so my example will appear more or less the same in all versions of IE/win. > Also, I'd like to know if the approach I am taking is the right one. It is fine apart from the potential box model problems. Readability isn't good on top of such a background though, so you may have to adjust the rose-images a bit. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
