Adam Hardy on 07/10/07 16:45, wrote: > Gunlaug Sørtun on 07/10/07 02:42, wrote: >> Notice that you have 103 validation errors in your page... >> <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.gargantus.com/sylvie/list.html> >> >> >> ...while I have 0 - zero - in live copies of the very same page. >> >> Notice also that I use the correct - and strict - doctype that reflects >> the source-code I serve. >> You OTOH are using the wrong - and transitional - doctype. >> Don't do that... >> <http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_25.html> >> >> Transitional means "almost standard" in Firefox and other non-IE >> browsers. That "almost standard" means non-standard treatment of images >> that are not aligned with real text in an element, which tends to give >> one appearance in non-IE browsers and another in IE. > > I see those errors - caught out by Firefox again! I used the Firefox File > menu > 'Save Page as' menu command to save that one page from the website with the > style sheet and the images onto my public server. Unfortunately Firefox > re-parsed the HTML and munged some of it, which is causing the validation > errors. > > I used Transitional because I use Java Server Pages and some of the helper > code > I used outputs <img target='_xxxx'> HTML. I'll ditch that now and use Strict. > That JSP code was out-of-date anyway. I had no idea (again) that the > transitional doc-type had that effect. > > I put the fixed version up there in the same place: > http://www.gargantus.com/sylvie/list.html
I forgot to say, that fixes it all nicely! Thanks again Adam ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
