Hi Shawn, wanted to say thank you for your suggestions. I did not notice your message until you sent it to my individual mail box.
What you suggested worked perfectly well. It is not the solution I've eventually adopted, this due to the adding of a tooltip incompatible with absolute positioning of the "works" link. If you wish, check the code at: http://www.giuseppecraparottacv.co.uk/work-web-test-works-absolute.html Please note that the code still has to be cleaned and redundant properties are not been yet removed. The design looks really ugly being that incompleted. What's interesting is go through the problem-solving process leading to the solution you provided: This was the initial situation: Having added width:100% to the "odd" and "even" lis in order to absolutely position the "works" links in IE6 properly, increasing the page size implied the appearance of phantom gaps - as you defined them :-) - in IE6 and 7. Too bad... As a fix, you suggested to float the lis to the left. Now I have few questions, maybe you have some time to help me to "freeze this experience into everlasting Knowledge" (wow...) Being the width of the ul defined, floating the lis doesn't have the standard function to put the lis side by side but instead of simulating a kind of IE-dedicated "glue effect" sticking the lis together no matter the size of the page. Would you approve this reasoning? Wanna add something to the rationale? Could what I've experienced be appropriately defined as a IE bug? Is there some logic behind this IE behaviour, or is it just a manifestation of IE non-sense? Any mistake from my side? Thank you very much Shawn, Giuseppe ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
