Timothy Kelty wrote:
> I guess it would still make sense semantically if I had the image
> <dd> below the <dt> still, right?
Don't know what kind of "semantic sense" its _position_ is supposed to
carry, but if it's a product-image it might make sense to move the
dd.image in the source-code so it came first after dt.
"Title of product" followed by "image of product" make sense to me.
Positioning it to the far left can be done the same way, since absolute
positioned elements don't take up space on their own anyway.
Semantics does of course apply to visual order - CSS, but if we end up
introducing a different meaning through the order of the the styled and
the unstyled content, care has to be taken.
Some visitors may experience and use a site visually (styled) and
non-visually (fairly unstyled) at the same time - because of handicaps
or for other reasons, and it is best to avoid styled vs. un-styled
conflicts when possible.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
