Rob Emenecker wrote: >> No, it is not correct at all. There is no such requirement anywhere. > > Being "correct" does not mean there "must" exist a requirement, as your > argument implies. If there is no requirement one way or the other, then > having a FONT tag is as correct as not having a FONT tag. There's no > "requirement" for me to wipe my bottom after using the toilet, but it > certainly is "correct" to do so! ;)
Jukka's right, there's nothing in the CSS rules that say you *can't* use formatting in the content itself. But what's the point of using things like the <font> tag when you're using CSS? It just seems sloppy to me, like something that my employer's ancient enterprise content management system might spit out. -- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] authenticity, honesty, community ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
