Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:52:27AM -0500, David Laakso wrote: > >> Dave Sherohman wrote: >> >>> Both questions relate to my site at http://seethefnews.com/ and can be >>> seen on the page http://seethefnews.com/index.cgi?action=topwords >>> >>> >> With regard to only your first question, a negative margin layout using >> pixel width for the sidebar and percent for the content may do better >> for you. This one [1] has the same source order as yours-- content >> first, nav second... >> >> [1] <http://blog.html.it/layoutgala/LayoutGala31.html> >> > > Thanks! > The main thing bothering me is that I have no idea why the wrapper is > necessary (beyond "it don't work if it ain't there").
The original negative-margin layout concept is explained in this tutorial [1]. Many spins have been done on it. Best, ~dL [1] <http://www.alistapart.com/articles/negativemargins/> -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
