David Lackso wrote:
> MacOS X > 10.4.11 > > IE/5.2 screenshot: > <http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/ag.png> Thank you David. Well it looks like IE/Mac shall get IE7 styles since ordinary comments are treated as elements as I later realized. > Opera/9.24 > The footer is as intended. > Only approximately 100px of the image appears beneath the nav block. That is correct. A screenshot on windows. http://css-class.com/test/test2.jpg >From the left are Safari 3 with (proper background), Safari 3, Firefox 3, >Opera 9.5 and Mozilla 1.7. They all handle my negative margin on the element which has a pink background in the screenshot apart from Opera 2.26 or earlier which shows is a bug. So it has slightly different rules and looks at bit odd with two strips. > Safari/3.0.4 > The footer is as intended. > There is an approximately 40px gap between the footer and the bottom of > the image. So is Safari 3 on Mac different to my screenshot on Window? > Camino/1.5.4 and Firefox/2.0.0.12 > The footer butts the bottom of the nav (no image). > > Best, > ~dL Well thats the same bug as I see in Flock (Firefox 2.0.0.12) and it is due to the overflow-y:hidden on the container, they will only show the one strip like Mozilla 1.7 but Mozilla 1.7 is rendering correctly. That no good :-). The no way to separate Gecko 1.8 from 1.9. I will have to prepare some imports for IE. Alan http://css-class.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
