I would certainly advocate setting up the list method. It shouldn't take you more than 1/2 an hour. :-)
I have nothing against JavaScript per se, but I have to agree with you. If you're writing the main part in CSS, it's sensible to do all you can and avoid unnecessary code. Not only that, but the CSS is far more compact and easier to write and maintain. I maintain a site where they often want to change the buttons or add or subtract them. I dread the nightmare I have to go through having to 'make' each button 3 times and overlay the text in XaraX, then export and let JavaScript do the entire placement, having first had to calculate the number of buttons, the placement and the link in several places in the HTML. It's an older site (with frames) and I will be converting it one day. Regards, Alan. www.theatreorgans.co.uk www.virtualtheatreorgans.com Admin: ConnArtistes, UKShopsmiths, 2nd Touch & A-P groups Shopsmith 520 + bits Flatulus Antiquitus ----- Original Message ----- From: tmesa.mesadesignhouse To: Alan K Baker Cc: CSS-D List Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 7:49 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] Almost there!! But my nav buttons in IE... Yeah, I'll be doing that, because the a:visited and a:hover will be swapping out the image with another. Perhaps that's what I need to do before I worry any more about the spacing. Who says you need JavaScript to swap images?? I used the CSS image swapping with a website I did for a coffee shop, and as you hovered over each of the nav buttons, the bullets - er, coffee beans - would rotate, so it looks like they're jumping beans. :-) The power of CSS. Thanks! Theresa Mesa Mesa Design House http://mesadesignhouse.com 909-796-5739 909-796-5789 (Fax) ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
