Hi there, Many thanks for for your kind help. It was good to see what you removed and what was added :)
To me, the initial typography is too big. But as you say, it's a personal thing. You have been very helpful. Thank you Kind regards Karl > > /After Philippe/, and with correction of the "quirksmode" issue he raised, > how about we take it up a couple of notches beyond that and try to provide > what is also needed to make it work beyond removing the comment above the > doctype, validate the markup, ditch some of the redundant and unnecessary > code; and, as important (to me, at least) since you posted on another > another thread yesterday regarding typography, attempt to make the page > readable for children of all ages? > > Please see the changed source file with change of doctype and different > character encoding than you had along with the many changes/comments made to > the CSS file. > > Cursory checked in IE/6, IE/7 and some compliant browsers. > > html > <http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/v.htm> > css > <http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/v_files/master00.css> > > HTH > J. M. W. Turner > > > > -- > http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ > > -- Regards Karl Bedingfield ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
