All:

Thanks to everybody who wrote, both on and off list.  I found some 
useful notes on a basic Apache installation from a technofreaks site in 
Malaysia and downloaded that.  I knew of Apache by repute and must say I 
was shocked to find that the server that powers 30 percent of web sites 
on all platforms is only about 6 Mb in size.    Clearly the developers 
will have to load it with null bytes to get an install size of 40 Mb for 
street cred against all the bloat ware out there.  8^)

For future reference I have summarised all the posts to aid anyone else 
who in the future might want a simple server for localhost testing.

Regards,
Hedley



Glenn and Fred wrote:
> What operating system are you using?
>

Windows XP SP3

> Windows XP, Linux, Mac?  Windows XP has a Web server integrated if I 
> am not mistaken, maybe only the Pro version, maybe it's in XP home...

I have tried Microsoft IIS (Internet Information Services) before but it 
hogs the CPU and makes using other apps simultaneously almost impossible.

Christopher wrote:
> I don't really think this qualifies as lightweight, but
> I set up apache a couple of times and it was really
> easy. I only mention this because I feel like I have
> the same "gaps" in knowledge that you do.
Well, you convinced me!

David Jones wrote:
> Setting it up using Apache2Triad <http://apache2triad.net> makes it very
> lightweight. Lightweight enough that I used to run it on my old desktop
> Windows98 PC ... Apache2Triad is very easy for novices (and when it
> comes to configuring a web server, that's pretty much exactly where I
> am!)
>   

Jerod wrote:
> I'd also recommend checking out some from this list:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiny_web_servers
>
> I've used shttpd before (although they're on a different version now)
> and had good luck with it.
>   

Michael wrote:
> Lighty http://www.lighttpd.net/ and nginx http://nginx.net/ have both
> been getting good press recently.
> http://news.netcraft.com/archives/web_server_survey.html
>   

David wrote:
> There was another one I've used - a command line only one, and the only
> way you could stop it was to use Task Manager to kill it.  I think it
> was TinyWeb - yes, here it is:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/tinyweb/
>
> Very lightweight (53KB!!!), supports CGI, configured only via command
> line parameters.
>   

Tim wrote:
> It may not count as lightweight, but I found XAMPP very easy to set up.
> http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-windows.html
>
>   

David wrote:
> As you have seen, files served directly from the hard drive do not
> work when using "root-relative" addressing.  ...
>
> The default install should work well for you-- it does for me,
> anyway. Other packages I tried needed tweaking, which takes time
> and learning. Hopefully you, too, can just "load and go."
>
> Get it here-- it's free:
>
>   <http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html>
>
>   


Allan wrote:
> Anyway, in response to Hedley Fingers post, I would suggest he looks at
> WAMP (http://www.wampserver.com/en/) ant the excellent guides to be
> found at http://guides.jlbn.net/
--

Hedley Finger

28 Regent Street   Camberwell VIC 3124   Australia
Tel. +61 3 9809 1229   Fax. (call phone first)
Mob. (cell) +61 412 461 558
Email. "Hedley Finger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to