> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > discuss.org] On Behalf Of Kenoli Oleari > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:33 AM > To: CSS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS tables > > The rant is fine, though the link you sent is broken. I wonder if you > have a current link, I'm curious.
I guess wrapping was the issue. Here is a shorter URL: http://tinyurl.com/float-less-layouts > I also felt the Sitepoint article and book was reaching to make > something out of nothing. I agree. It's not much more exciting than http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#table-display > In the long run, it will be great if all > browsers can implement standards and if standards can provide some > really useful tools. I also suspect that having to reach for > solutions had inspired some creativity that may never have surfaced if > tables had been the only available positioning tool. imho, what make people look for solutions is not related to the tools, but to the fact that browsers are broken or can't do what we want them to do ;) -- Regards, Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
