David Laakso wrote:
> Anyone found a less cumbersome or more efficient way of writing the
> rules for it?
>
>
>
>
>
Georg Sortun was kind enough to provide what I was looking for (and had
seen before but could not remember where).
Georg wrote (sent to me off-list):
:after {content: "."; display: block; height: 0; clear: both; overflow:
hidden; visibility: hidden;}
...with the preferred selector in front. Mine is actually longer than
the original, to safeguard against a potential bug in IE8 - IE8b1 had it.
Old IE/win and IE/Mac get their own rules as part of the regular styling
or in separate stylesheets, so I usually don't care about them at this
point.
--
A thin red line and a salmon-color ampersand forthcoming.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
