tedd wrote: > >> http://www.clanjones.org/stnicks/20081214.php >> >> > > http://www.webbytedd.com/b4/css-centers/ > > see: http://www.webbytedd.com/b4/css-centers/a.css > setting the width and height of the > images is not really needed either and can be done (if needed) in css. > > However, if setting image size IS needed, then would someone please > tell me why
Because IE 6 and down is stupid. > and provide n example showing where omitting it would > screw something up? > > tedd > > The lower IEs often need both height and width of an image. Easier to include physical dimension in the html than not. Sometimes the dimensions need to be set in both the html and the css to avoid image distortion. -- A thin red line and a salmon-color ampersand forthcoming. http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
