Ib Jensen wrote:
> Shouldn't bee 100.01% or 100.1%, as many suggests in favor of
> rounding errors ?
Must be nearly a decade since rounding errors on "font-size: 100%"
created problems in a browser. Not that it hurts to add ".1" to it, but
it won't make a difference anywhere.
As have been pointed out: having "font-size: 80%" on body, followed by
"font-size: 0.83em" on #notizen p, means it isn't much font-size
left anywhere in there.
Simple font resizing doesn't seem to be enough in IE.
Guess it was such cases Microsoft had in mind when they added "ignore
font size in web pages" as an option in IE - a long time ago, while
other browsers introduced "minimum font size" to counteract mouse-type.
All you achieve by using such small text is that many visitors either
can't read your words of wisdom, or have to override your font size in
order to read it.
FYI: I apply "minimum font size = 14px" to all web pages, and if the
choice of font-family causes problems I change that to "16px" - on 96dpi
screens.
Since you also have an em-sized layout I also find it necessary to
apply "fit to width" to your page to make it stay within the browser
window, so I don't have to deal with long text lines and horizontal
scrollbars. The information on your pages is too interesting to be left
unreadable, and Danish isn't a problem at my end ;-)
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
