On 2009/02/17 17:13 (GMT-0600) RePost composed: > Felix Miata wrote:
>> To amplify David's original implication and subsequent response, use of px >> for sizing text is an affirmative design choice that whatever text sizes are >> acceptable to or preferred by the design's visitors are utterly irrelevant. >> Whatever size in px seems most appropriate to you in your own environment >> bears little useful relationship what may be appropriate in the environments >> of the visitors. >> A corollary is px for setting line height. >> http://fm.no-ip.com/auth/line-height-inherit.html demonstrates how it can be >> a problem. > Felix, I don't quite get this "Use only <number> for line-height" > business proposed at the link you provided. You don't understand the demonstration you see there? > If your "number" is neither percentage nor em nor pixel, what does it > represent? A multiplier. Other multipliers are em and %, but these others have meanings when inherited that can be problematic, which that URL is supposed to demonstrate. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#propdef-line-height -- "Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up." Ephesians 4:29 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
