I did a copy-and-paste validation and only found a couple of unencoded "&" two 
missing alts, and an xmlns attribute that I need to get rid of--I can't imagine 
those being the trouble.  They're not things I want in there, and I should find 
and fix them regardless, but they're not the sort of thing that I imagine even 
IE would choke on.  Have you had experience with browsers breaking on those 
particular validation errors?  I'm curious now, because I may not be able to 
fix 
them. We're on a CMS, and it does bizarre things to code; sometimes I can 
wrestle it into submission, sometimes not.

~Rebecca

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Rebecca Mazur wrote:
>> If someone could just recognize and name the bug for me, that would be 
>> a help, as then I could go searching for solutions.
> 
>> http://www.kenyon.edu/x12305.xml
> 
> The bug is clear enough, but finding a fix isn't.
> 
> I found it easier to reproduce the problem in IE6 - multiple times, and
> that IE-version also shows clearly that one can fix the problem by
> cleaning up the source-code. I used HTML Tidy on a local copy.
> 
> Once it becomes stable in IE6 it is also perfectly stable in IE7.
> However, trying to analyze what my Tidy actually did that fixed it isn't
> easy since I can't use the validator on your original.
> 
> regards
>     Georg
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to