>> I think your chances of getting that site functional in IE/5 is slim >> to none. > Are you meaning, the structure of the site won't suit IE/5, or that > IE/5 is beyond working with? > > Thanks for your efforts to help! > > Regards, > David > >
The comment was based on the erroneous uri you provided, and that given that erroneous address, the page was worse than upside down and backward in IE/5.01. Whether you wish to support IE/5.01 and IE/5.5 with the correct uri is your call. Some of us have difficulty, if not having given up on, providing continued pixel perfect rendition in IE/6. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
