CSS is now 100% valid. Not much I can do with the XHTML at this point. On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mike Smith <grum....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess I should also have prefaced this with the fact that I'm working on > a template in a CMS and the CMS tends to spit out bad code. Believe me, my > handcoding is far better than what the CMS generates. It's one of the > limitations of the job and it's very frustrating. > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Mike Smith <grum....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Forgot about validating. thanks >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:49 AM, David Laakso < >> da...@chelseacreekstudio.com> wrote: >> >>> Mike Smith wrote: >>> >>>> Look at it in anything but IE6 to see the correct look. >>>> >>>> Page URL: http://magazine.jhsph.edu/2009/spring/index.html >>>> CSS can be found in the usual ways. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> >>>> -Mike >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Hmm. You mean like IE/7.0 is correct? >>> Good idea to validate the markup (and correct the CSS error) before >>> posting. >>> >> >> > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
