MEM wrote: > > @David: > You were right, again. > The warnings were now gone. > > *Quest: the true meaning of "warning"...* > Is it because, somehow, the validator validates also potential problems on > potential browser configurations, hence, calling those potential problems: > warnings? >
You put it well. And enough is enough... If in thoroughly checking the site cross os/browser, these potential "problems/warnings" do not adversely effect the site, then you are fairly safe in assuming that you may ignore them. In plain English: if it works, don't fix it. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
