Val, Thanks for the reply. When I logged into the file manager there were many image files, which I wasn't expecting, so I gave the designer the benefit in writing this email to find if maybe it was done according to some acceptable practice that I'm not familiar with. The text seemed to be in the alt tags of the images, and I started parsing through the files, but then figured that I'd shoot a quick email to the CSS list.
I offered to make some updates to the text on the site as a favor, and had intentions of toying around with the CSS while I was at it. Therefore in regards to redoing the whole site, that would be great but I don't know if I have the time to do that much unpaid work. Unfortunately, maybe if it ain't broke, then don't fix it? Sincerely, Brian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Val Dobson" <valdob...@gmail.com> To: "Brian M. Curran" <br...@brianmcurran.com> Cc: <css-d@lists.css-discuss.org> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 8:53 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] Looking for a second opinion on a site's structure A whole site done virtually all in Javascript??? Yes, Brian, I can certainly confirm that it could have been better done. Do you have the power to rewrite the coding? Val 2009/10/12 Brian M. Curran <br...@brianmcurran.com>: > Hi, > I was just given access to a site to make updates, and when I logged in to > look at the files, I saw something completely different than what I was > expecting. Can someone take a look at it and confirm that it would have > been much better to have done this site using more HTML and CSS? > > http://www.merfnyc.org/home.html > > Sincerely, > Brian --------------------------- www.oakleafcircle.org.uk www.valdobson.co.uk www.astrodiary.co.uk ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
