r...@catjuggling.com wrote > I know you didn't ask for a critique, so I hope I didn't overstep my bounds.
No problem with that. I'm interested in all opinions. > I am using a laptop with a wide screen monitor, and this page always comes up > with the > first two images on top and the third one below. It makes the page look > broken. The 'productive page' is at http://www.maireadnesbitt.com/news/tinkerbell.html . It looks all right at greater windows widths. I have begun using CSS so that the display will degrade more or less gracefully as the window width is decreased. The rightmost image, then the next one, move under the other as that width is decreased. Is that what you call broken? If I put one image on each line, that will look all right even at a width of 800 pixels, but will leave an awful lot of white space on wider windows. That's what I would call broken. On the main page, http://www.maireadnesbitt.com/ , I have a Flash presentation which does not adjust to changing window width and I thus have 5 versions of the HTML-code for that page! I'll be pleased when we can move Flash presentation somewhere else. > If it were me I would keep the images locked side-by-side, but that is just > my two cents. That would call for horizontal scrolling, which for me sacrifices elegance and aesthetics and ease of use. I admit that my emphasis is on information, rather than elegance and aesthetics. With my current effort at http://www.maireadnesbitt.com/_bruce/news/tinkerbellnew.html , I have lots of problems. I'm a new CSS-user. I expected it to be simpler. I'm fighting with myself so that I don't take recourse to tables. Cheers Bruce ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
