2009/10/31 Charles Miller <chuckmil...@new.rr.com>:

> Would you mind commenting on why HTML 4.01 Strict? And what the differences
> are? This interests me.

Transitional is (more or less) Strict + Legacy junk that should be avoided.

HTML is better supported than XHTML. (Since Internet Explorer doesn't
support XHTML, you have to claim it is HTML and jump through hoops to
write something that is both XHTML and almost-HTML, and those hoops
are, IMO, more trouble then they are worth in the vast majority of
cases).

-- 
David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk><http://blog.dorward.me.uk>
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to