Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> Line box. In the first testcase, where the anchor has padding, the box
> is actually 25px tall, according to the DomInspector/Firebug. 6px
> padding, 16px/19px font-size/line-height (computed value for 'normal'
> line-height with Helvetica @ 16px on my system).
Ah, font-size/line-height.
[...]
> The img is taken out of the flow. But the inline element (<a>) has
> padding, it is rendered and takes up space, and affects the layout.
>
> ---
> (
> and, as someone else mentioned in this thread, the OP probably didn't
> intent to have all 'a' elements to have padding as specified by this
> .sidebar-item h3, p, a {
> padding:3px 19px;
> }
> The OP probably wanted .sidebar-item h3, .sidebar-item h3 p,
> .sidebar-item h3 a {}
> )
>
> Philippe
> ---
> Philippe Wittenbergh
> http://l-c-n.com/
I was reading that selector string wrong, I must have check it about 5
times. There is indeed padding. Thank you Philippe.
They don't show defaults for anchors on the Gecko and WebKit defaults
styles sheets. I would like to add such defaults to this table.
<http://css-class.com/test/css/defaults/UA-style-sheet-defaults.htm>
I would say that we have.
a {
text-decoration: underline;
color:blue;
padding:3px 0;
line-height:1em;
}
Never thought about inline elements.
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
