>>I was asking for a "No, because..." or "Yes, because..." response.
>Fair enough. >No, because it's not a paragraph, it's an image. A reader (forget humans, just >think reading mechanisms, which can include humans) when it sees a <p> expects >to >see a paragraph of content. Instead it sees an image. The proper markup >for that is the <img> tag. If that needs a wrapper, that's what <div> is for >(it's for any >arbitrary block, as <span> is for any arbitrary string). >So, wrenching this over in the direction of CSS, when you want to style an >image and perhaps some associated text, the proper thing to style would be a ><div> >rather than a <p>. It'd be really sweet if HTML had a tag that would >encompass not only the graphic itself but also associated content, but I've >not seen any >stirrings in that direction. >Skip Knox >Boise State University Thank you! :-) ...And of course thanks to David too. :-) ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
