Geoff Lane wrote:
On Friday, September 24, 2010, 6:12:06 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:

The technique used on Wikipedia won't give you the wrapping you want.
What about using two spans and using this approach:

<li><span class="num">2.1.1.2</span><span class="text">It shall be construed
a crime against humanity to recover an ancient musical instrument from a
secluded cave and subsequently play it in front of others.</span></li>

.legal li li {padding-left: 4em;}
.legal li span.num {float: left; margin-right: .3em; }
.legal li span.text {display: block; overflow: hidden; zoom: 1;}
---

Thanks Thierry. I've just tried your suggestion. Unfortunately, in
Firefox 3.6 both the automatic and manual numbering appear and in
Internet Explorer 8 I get the manual numbering stacked above the
paragraph text rather than to its left.

So:

(FF)
 1. 1. Blah-de-blah.

 (IE)
 1.
 Blah-de-blah.

 Just in case I've misunderstood and for info, I copied your text to
 the head of my document (which is HTML 4.01 Transitional)


Hello Geoff,

Please check this article about doctypes [1].

This doctype,

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">

triggers quirks mode [2] in all browsers. IE8 quirks mode is the same as IE5 quirks mode. One thing which you face straight away is the box model differences [3]. This would have an impact here.


.legal li li {padding-left: 4em;}


Is the markup ok enough to give this doctype.


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";>



1. <http://hsivonen.iki.fi/doctype/>
2. <http://www.quirksmode.org/css/quirksmode.html>
3. <http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=E0989953B6F20B41>



--
Alan http://css-class.com/

Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to