On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:23 PM, David Hucklesby <huckle...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/16/10 10:28 AM, Chetan Crasta wrote re: http://fattoad.co.uk/ >> >> Give div#inner_wrap a height of around 1100px. The testimonial is >> getting cutoff because the height of 1015px is insufficient. >> > > FWIW I generally find that "min-height" works better than plain "height" > in a majority of cases. (And "height" behaves like "min-height" in > IE 6...) > > Cordially, > David > --
I hope it is okay to fork this discussion. (didn't want to disturb the original thread) Reading David's response I realize that I vastly under use min-height. I would like to correct that and start using it in appropriate settings. For the life of me I can't recall why I shied away from min-height a few years back. I started to use it. But, ran into some trouble and an article or two that somehow convinced me that I was better off trying to make due without it. That was then, this is now. I am hoping that someone might be able to point to a good source of info on proper use of min-height so that I don't open a can of worms with cross-browser issues or other gotchas. Regards, Claude Needham ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
