On 16/04/2011 10:08 PM, Ingo Chao wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. April 2011 schrieb Philippe Wittenbergh<e...@l-c-n.com>:
On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote:
This raises an interesting question: the reflected text in HTML or CSS?
I'd argue that the reflection is decoration and only decoration, and thus part
of the stylesheet.
Some hate the effect [1], therefore, it is decoration.
Ingo
[1] "Would someone please mop the floor?" http://csscreator.com/node/21265
I believe Kevin asked a good question. I agree with you and him that
since the affect is styling or decoartion, then styling should be where
it belongs. There are two ways to achieve the affect. Philippe demoed a
method with more browser support.
Another question is what else is possible with CSS? I presume some would
believe that CSS animation with a little JS is outright abuse of CSS.
Here is one demo of mine where I hack in a box-shadow and then position
it under another element (later in the source) that has a transparent
background. I achieved what is forbidden by the CSS spec (a box-shadow
seen through a semi transparent background of the element creating the
shadow).
http://css-class.com/test/css/shadows/box-shadow-borders.htm
Seriously, I think CSS and CSS3 is wonderful.
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
