Hiya Andrew,

No solutions here I'm afraid, although I have often experienced the same
thing and wondered why I'm always so far out on my first attempt.

Just a few words of opinionated warning (that you shouldn't take too
seriously): as an ex-full-time designer and someone who now works with
non-technical designers, I've often been cynical of the various ways CSS3
encourages *programmers* to define effects which are then procedurally
achieved by various UAs' rendering engines. The truth is that even for the
most experienced & competent designers, trial and error is necessary. The
notion that we can systematically write code to create
procedurally-generated effects to simulate aesthetically sensitive optical
illusions is not one I can stand behind fully: for example I have yet to use
border radius in conjunction with background gradients and box shadows —
sliding doors CSS and background images allow that bit more control and
pixel-perfection that allow designers to make it look consummately elegant
and convincing rather than functionally embossed. In short, when you're
talking about optical illusions and a certain level of detail with coherent
aesthetics, I don't believe it's possible to algorithmically generate the
lot based on small input values.

But I digress. Whenever I've tried to achieve the effect I've done it by
trial, observation and error.The same values of relative darkness or
lightness applied to other colours have never worked, and I've needed to
achieve the effect manually.

…I'd be very interested if anybody were to get this right though!


Regards,
Barney Carroll

barney.carr...@gmail.com
07594 506 381
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to