On 6/8/11 4:44 PM, Dagmar Noll wrote:
I am working on improving the accessibility of my web sites.
I am using several different css analysis tools.
Webaim's Color contrast checker
(http://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/) and Juicy Studio's
checker (http://juicystudio.com/services/csstest.ph) dissagree about
the following :
body {
background: #9C6;
color: #000;
}
Webaim passes the colors, Juicy studio gives a warning that the
contrast is not sufficient for achieving WCAG specification. I'm not
sure what's going on here. Does anyone know what the nuance is that I
am missing between the two tools?
Thanks,
Dagmar
Font-weight? But either way: machine tests are just that. As in most all
matters, common sense -- and actual testing among those who may, or may
not, be vision impaired -- prevails...
Best,
~d
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
