On Jul 6, 2011, at 11:55 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > I suppose this means, then, that the site is not an example of using > text-overflow: ellipsis. This impression is confirmed by the observation that > the style sheets for the page do not contain such a declaration at all.
ahem, Jukka. 2 instances of text-overflow: ellipsis in http://www.gandi.net//static/css/reset-min~reset-fonts~reset-fonts-grids~960_24_col~forms~fonts~global~boxes~default~search_box_domains~cms~tinymce~block_scroller~homepage.css?v=17394 > So you're effectively saying that due to a bug, Firefox may behave (to some > extent) _as if_ there was such a declaration in the stylesheets. No, he saying that the recently implemented text-overflow: ellipsis in Gecko nightly builds has (had) a bug in its implementation. Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
