7.9.2011 20:17, Chris Morton wrote:
Please consider www.eigen.com.
You didn't validate... only one markup error (spurious </div>) might be
serious to styling (indirectly - if it reflects unintended <div> structure).
See the bold blue text (e.g., "Experience
Artemis in action!") in the middle column (Updates)?
Yes. It's confusing: by color, it looks like link, but it's not
underlined like some other texts on the page.
I need it to have the
same teal color (#007F9E) as the adjacent hyperlinks.
That does not sound like a good idea at all. It would add to the
confusion. But now to the technicalities...
Right now the text is
in a conventional text block and uses it as the style.
I don't quite see what you mean by that.
I'm using an external CSS page; here is a snippet that controls stuff in
this column:
#updates {
[...]
color: #000000;
}
I don't see how that relates to the issue - it sets the color to black.
And it does not apply to the <strong> text.
When I open the page on Firefox with Firebug installed, right-click on
some bold text we're discussion and select "Inspect Element", then the
pane "Style" contains:
#wraper #updates p strong {
color: #0000FF;
}
strong.teal {
color: #007F9E;
}
so that the latter declaration is struck-out. This corresponds to what
happens in the cascade: the rule with higher specificity wins.
If the rule for #wraper #updates p strong is removed, the <strong> text
appears in teal color, as expected. So why is it there?
--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
