Karl Bedingfield wrote:
Well I cleaned up the validation a little. As far as I can see the other code is auto-generated and beyond my control. I still think there is a CSS issue I am missing. Just don't know what.
Well, that's quite possible :
W3C CSS Validator results for http://static.tumblr.com/kzkayxt/8smlsxsbv/css.css (CSS level 2.1) Sorry! We found the following errors (76)
Philip Taylor ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
