I almost always have to use a conditional stylesheet to get around one 
idiosyncracy or another in IE. They are getting shorter and shorter as my CSS 
skills improve.

overflow: hidden helps keep IE in step with everyone else, in my experience.

I recommend doing whatever you need to do suing CSS# but check the site 
periodically in IE and install the developer tools for IE so you can see what 
crazy tangent IE has looped off to.


On Apr 12, 2012, at 10:03 AM, michelle bowman wrote:

> Another possible strategy... would be to go ahead and use the CSS 3
> attributes you think will enhance your site. Then use conditional
> statements to include an IE Stylesheet, after your original stylesheet.
> 
> Basically using this method, you'd add an additional stylesheet to fix any
> problems that might arise.  An example of what this would look like is
> below:
> 
> <!--[if IE 7]>
>  <link href="css/ie7.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen">
> <![endif]-->
> 
> A practical use for this could be using the "text-shadow" attribute. Maybe
> the text-shadow looks awesome in Firefox... but in IE 7 the text might be
> illegible when the shadow does not display. So you could use an IE
> stylesheet to change the color of the text to one that works without the
> shadow.
> 
> Here's a link to a good article that explains IE conditional statements:
> http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html
> 
> Also if you're interested in learning some more general knowledge about
> making your site work in various browsers,  here are a few links on
> graceful degradation & progressive enhancement.
> http://www.sitepoint.com/progressive-enhancement-graceful-degradation-basics/
> http://www.alistapart.com/articles/understandingprogressiveenhancement/
> 
> hope that's helpful!
> 
> Michelle
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Ingo <leo.ing...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> meera kibe schrieb am 11.04.2012 04:42
>> 
>> 
>>> keen to use it css3 for a website but i also want to cater to IE
>>> people.
>> 
>> http://caniuse.com/
>> 
>> 
>> Best, Ingo
>> 
>> ______________________________**______________________________**__________
>> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
>> http://www.css-discuss.org/**mailman/listinfo/css-d<http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d>
>> List wiki/FAQ -- 
>> http://css-discuss.incutio.**com/<http://css-discuss.incutio.com/>
>> List policies -- 
>> http://css-discuss.org/**policies.html<http://css-discuss.org/policies.html>
>> Supported by evolt.org -- 
>> http://www.evolt.org/help_**support_evolt/<http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/>
>> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

-- 
Lorin Rivers
Mosasaur: Killer Technical Marketing <http://www.mosasaur.com>
<mailto:lriv...@mosasaur.com>
512/203.3198 (m)


______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to