> Nor to me. The only thing I did not have time to check was the image > slider script to see if it is globally redefining the img tag somehow. > But as it is, it would be physically impossible that the test rule I > provided would not work - unless the images are in tables or in DIVs set > to display as table cells. In that case, you would need to use > table-layout: fixed.
The slider wrapper DIV goes to display:none once you drop below 700 pixels width. Neither the tables or DIVs in the content area that is breaking have the display properties set at all. Widths are either auto or 100%. I did fix one issue where the box model was taking on a negative left margin due to a width + padding that exceeded 100%. That has been addressed, but it does not resolve the non-resizing image. Continuing to scrutinize further! ____________________________________ Rob Emenecker @ Hairy Dog Digital www.hairydogdigital.com Please note: Return e-mail messages are only accepted from discussion groups that this e-mail address subscribes to. All other messages are automatically deleted. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
