Michael Stevens wrote: > Hmmm... > > That's an old PNG hack I've used forever. I actually just validated it > (index at least) and did not receive this error. I'll see if I can't > figure out why and fix it...
I think you may have validated the HTML but not the CSS, Mike. And that particular fragment looks far more like JavaScript than CSS to me : is it in the correct place ? > > Is there a better alternative to getting PNG transparency out of > browsers that don't support it? That I can think of PNG transparency and > the rounded corners are the only "maybes" that I used. Pass. > > I do get this warning: > Line 11, Column 72: Using windows-1252 instead of the declared encoding > iso-8859-1. > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> > > Which I have absolutely no idea what it means. But, since the data I'll > be eventually pulling out of a database for my gallery will be UTF-8 I > suspect I should change that to charset=UTF-8? Don't know nearly enough > about character encoding... :( That is an HTML 5 issue : why they decided to prefer a proprietary encoding to an ISO one is not something I pretend to understand. Philip Taylor ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
