> > I think you will have more success using Bootstrap's .nav markup, styled > with > .nav-pills and .nav-stacked. The current markup will need some difficult > CSS to > resolve, methinks. > > (This just from a cursory look at Bootstrap - you may find something > better.) >
The current markup won't need difficult CSS, but it would need more specificity than I would personally prefer. 100% agree that if bootstrap has something built in for this, you should go that route. Dunno about "working beautifully" as I can't even focus them with my > keyboard, > let alone having any ARIA to assist screen-readers. Hopefully they do > better on > touch screens. > > What do you have against select boxes - which would be easier to process > server-side, I would think? 100% agree with this sentiment as well. Granted <option>'s aren't as customizable as what Michael has going here, the benefit to ease of digestion (assuming server side code is the first to get it) and accessibility is a discussion worth having with the client, IMO. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
